<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Erik Pukinskis, Snowed In &#187; architecture</title>
	<atom:link href="http://snowedin.net/blog/category/architecture/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://snowedin.net/blog</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Jul 2010 07:06:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Twitter needs to get creative</title>
		<link>http://snowedin.net/blog/2008/05/22/twitter-needs-to-get-creative/</link>
		<comments>http://snowedin.net/blog/2008/05/22/twitter-needs-to-get-creative/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 22:21:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>erik</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[architecture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://snowedin.net/blog/2008/05/22/twitter-needs-to-get-creative/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nik Cubrilovic over at TechCrunch has a post up about why Twitter is having a hard time scaling:
Twitter is unique in that it needs to parse a large number of messages and deliver them to multiple recipients, with each user having unique connection. 
Hmm, that sounds like something familiar&#8230; some other site I know.. somethi&#8230; [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nik Cubrilovic over at TechCrunch has a post up about <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/22/twitter-at-scale-will-it-work/">why Twitter is having a hard time scaling</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p><em>Twitter is unique in that it needs to parse a large number of messages and deliver them to multiple recipients, with each user having unique connection. </em></p></blockquote>
<p>Hmm, that sounds like something familiar&#8230; some other site I know.. somethi&#8230; Oh, wait&#8230; EMAIL.</p>
<p>Why doesn&#8217;t Twitter just set up a little mini internet-like SMTP-inspired network behind their load balancer, with the equivalent of SMTP servers handling a handful of twitter users on each server, put a bunch of routers in between, and do it that way?  I mean, isn&#8217;t Twitter just email with a bunch of functionality cut out?Â  Isn&#8217;t posting on twitter the same thing as sending an one-line email to a bunch of friends?Â  And doesn&#8217;t everyone just read their tweets in the equivalent of a featureless inbox?</p>
<p>Forget about the whole one big database table idea that we think is mandatory for web apps.  Just copy a distributed architecture that you know will work and will scale.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://snowedin.net/blog/2008/05/22/twitter-needs-to-get-creative/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
