Yesterday, my team made its submission to the 2005 SIGCHI Conference. You can read the web-ified version here, which may or may not be kosher by SIGCHI’s standards, but I’ve pretty much decided that everything I write will eventually be available on my web site in one form or another. I am 23, and in order to be successful, I need people to buy into my ideas in the intellectual sense, not the financial one.
I think this paper is pretty good. It’s high enough quality that it could be accepted, but not such high quality that it’s guaranteed to be accepted. Here’s my grading scale for my own personal evaluation:
F – I was forced to leave out a portion of the assignment in order to complete it on time
D – I covered the bases for the assignment, but there are significant gaps in quality.
C – Everything is done, and it’s good.
B – Everything is done, and there are attempts at real insight and value, but it is wordy, unclear in places, and it leaves serious questions unaddressed
A – It is insightful, complete, concise, persuasive, and valuable.
By this standard, I would give the paper a B on content and a C on writing. I think the research we based our design on is a very solid foundation, and lays the playform for a phenomenal design. And I think our evaluation is somewhat special in that we did a longer-term experiment on a critical aspect of our design in addition to usability testing, thus the B on content. However, the experiment could have been better executed, and we could have done more iterations of design and usability. Alas, we didn’t really have the time. And working in a team, while increasing the reliability of the work, decreases the speed.
Still, I think we did well. If this were an assignment for a class, I think it would get an A. I think a lot of what I wrote this semester that got an A is a B/C on my scale. It seems like the graduate grading scale in school maps to my grading scale something like this:
B content/C writing = A
C content/C writing = A-/B+
D content/C writing = B
D content/D writing = B-
D content/F writing = C+
Of course, you can have F content and D writing by my standards and still get a B+ or even an A- sometimes, which is a shame.
Anyway, that’s what I’ve been working on for the last month or so, and I thought I would post it. It’s not perfect, but I feel like I’m getting closer to being able to write consistently great papers. We’ll give it another go around this semester.